This is nothing new and it's really what philosophers call an "appeal to ignorance". No evidence suggests that Romans used crosses for execution. Therefore Christ couldn't have been crucified. O.o
Right. Because Christ was supposedly crucified in... Rome? Ah, no, right. He was supposedly crucified on Mount Calvary, near Jerusalem. At least, that's the bits that the Council of Nicaea decided should be "official doctrine" along with his sudden elevation to divinity. :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
malionette
no subject
Date: 2010-07-02 03:10 pm (UTC)Right. Because Christ was supposedly crucified in... Rome? Ah, no, right. He was supposedly crucified on Mount Calvary, near Jerusalem. At least, that's the bits that the Council of Nicaea decided should be "official doctrine" along with his sudden elevation to divinity. :)